2009-2010 - Plays of the Week - Week
3
"Working together, we will all get better."
The
plays/questions described below occurred recently and are provided for
your review and discussion. The rulings given are based on NFHS rules.
NCAA rulings may be different. Have you seen an unusual play? Let all officials benefit from it by
sending it to Plays of the
Week
Play #1 - During the 2nd quarter A-1 goes in for a layup and is
intentionally pushed in the back by B-1. The try is successful. The
official awards A-1 two free throws and awards the ball out of bounds at
the spot nearest the foul to Team A for a designated spot throw-in. The
coach of Team B argues that A-1 should only get one free throw since the
try was good. Was the coach correct?
Answer: The coach was NOT correct. All intentional personal
fouls result in two free throws for the player who was fouled unless
that player was fouled attempting an unsuccessful three point try. In
that case the player would receive three free throws. (References: Rule
10.6 Penalties 4 & 5, Case Book Play 4.19.3 Situation A)
Play #2 - During a timeout when the 1st horn sounds, Team B
returns to the floor. Team A is still in the huddle when the 2nd horn
sounds. The official sounds his whistle, indicates that the ball
belongs to Team A by calling out their color and pointing in the
direction of their basket and places the ball on the designated spot on
the floor. B-2 becomes confused, runs over, steps out of bounds and
picks up the ball. The official charges Team B with a technical foul.
Was the official correct?
Answer: The official was NOT correct. By rule the technical foul
for touching the ball during a throw-in occurs if the ball is in the
possession of the thrower. It also could occur if the ball is touched
while being passed to a teammate along the endline during a throw-in
when moving along the endline is permitted. In this case it is a
violation by B-2 to break the boundary plane. The official should have
ruled this violation and reported a delay of game warning to the scorer
and to Team B's coach. (References: Rule 9.2.10 Penalties 1 & 3)
Play #3 - The score is B 55-A 51 with 20 seconds left in the
game. A's Coach informs U2 (new Lead) that he would like to request a
time-out if his team scores. A1, on a fast break, misses a layup and
his teammate, A3, grabs the rebound and while in the act of shooting
(and prior to the release of the ball), U2 sounds his whistle and grants
a timeout to Team A accidentally. The try goes in and the ball is at
the disposal of B. The officials decide this is an inadvertent whistle,
score the goal and give the ball to Team B for an endline throw-in.
Were the officials correct?
Answer: The officials were NOT correct. By rule the sounding of
the whistle caused the ball to become dead immediately. No try or tap
was in flight. No foul had been committed by the defense so, therefore,
continuous motion was not in effect. The goal should not have been
scored and, under the point of interruption rule, Team A should have
received the ball for a designated spot throw-in at the spot nearest to
where the ball was located when the intterruption occurred. (References:
Rule 6.7.5, 4.11, 4.36.1 & 4.36.2)
Play #4 - Before the last free throw of a multiple free throw
situation #42 from Team B is beckoned into the game for Team B. #32
goes to the bench and sits down. As #42 approaches the free throw lane,
the official notices that his jersey is untucked and sends him out of
the game. #32 gets off the bench and returns to the game. After the
successful free throw, #42, who has returned to the table, is beckoned
into the game by the officials. Were the officials correct?
Answer: The officials were correct in sending #42 out of the game
for the untucked jersey. However, #32 had been a player and had been
substituted for. By rule, #32 cannot return to the game until the clock
has legally started. So his return to the game was not legal. Someone
else on the bench should have replaced #42. Also once #42 was beckoned
into the game, he became a player. When he was sent out of the game, he
also has to wait until the clock has legally started before he can
return. He should not have been permitted back into the game after the
successful free throw. (References: Rule 3.3.5, 3.3.4, 3.3.3, Case Book
Play 3.3.1 Situation E)
2009-2010 Plays of the Week - Week #1
2009-2010 Plays of the Week - Week #0
